The Weird World is a provider of viral news.

Saturday, October 15, 2016

Scientist Found A Proof of The Existence of Gods And Afterlives Using A Computer Program

Scientist Found A Proof of The Existence of Gods And Afterlives Using A Computer Program


Max Tegmark, a physicist, used a computer program to prove his theory of multiverse. His theory of multiverse also proved the existence of gods and afterlives. Max Tegmark used rational numbers as the basis of his program. Max Tegmark suggests that the existence of infinite number of universes is more probable than a one indivisible universe.

Scientist Found A Proof of The Existence of Gods And Afterlives Using A Computer Program


This program would be easy to write, which means that creating all possibilities may, in some cases, be much simpler than creating one very specific possibility.

K := 2;
while K > 1 do begin
if K mod 2 = 0 then
for J:= 1 to K – 1 do output
(J,'/',K – J)
else for J:= K – 1 down to 1 do
output (J,'/',K – J)
K := K + 1;
end;

The program produces all the rational numbers, starting with 1/1, 2/1, 1/2, 1/3, 2/2, 3/1, 4/1, 3/2, 2/3, 1/4, . . . . and so on.

Max Tegmark writes:

It consist of universes beyond observable cosmological horizons, those with different physical constants, those that to ours have possible observations and different probabilities, even all universes described by mathematical constructs, and those not measured by maths at all.
If Tegmark's model of universe turned out to be true, is it possible that these universes with different physical constants are in fact afterlives where the dead and and the damned reside?

Scientist Found A Proof of The Existence of Gods And Afterlives Using A Computer Program


Mythologies and religions throughout human history have verses written on scriptures regarding the existence of pantheons of Gods. Even the Bible suggest the existence of multiple gods. The most notable verse is one of the Ten Commandments “You shall have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20:3).

No comments:

Post a Comment

technical-inadequate
technical-inadequate
technical-inadequate
technical-inadequate